[Rockhounds] Re: MR Texas Supplement
Darryl Powell
dpowell13 at rochester.rr.com
Wed Feb 4 13:01:00 PST 2009
Dear List,
Obviously there are a lot of different observations and opinions
about the Texas Collector issue. I guess there will always be
differences of opinion as to the best role of MR as a publication. On
the whole, I have benefited from the range of information the magazine
provides, even if it doesn't always "hit" my interests or collecting
philosophy and I continue to look forward to receiving the new issues.
How's this for yet another perspective: considering how many
collection issues have been published by MR, is it possible that an
unstated direction of the magazine is to publish a number of collection
catalogs, as an historical record of what's out there in the mineral
collecting world right now and where it is? For example, the pink
Peruvian fluorite octahedra in the Spann collection at one time belonged
to Marty Zinn. Personally I always found it interesting to trace the
heritage of old specimens that at one time belonged to this count then
that mineralogist then that museum then that private collector, and so
on. I suppose there's some value, even if minimal, to have such records
available for future generations.
Lastly I must confess that I do like mineralogical eye candy and
enjoy the pretty pictures. Not much brain energy needed which is fine
at the end of a long and busy day.
Just some random thoughts. Best wishes to you all.
Darryl Powell
Manchester, NY
More information about the Rockhounds
mailing list