[Rockhounds] glacial erratics (was Stonehenge geology resolved)
GLENN ANDREWS
LIpumpkin at msn.com
Mon Feb 2 14:34:39 PST 2009
Any others care to express their opinion on this?
Well, if its broken into two pieces how does that make it one erratic?
----- Original Message -----
From: Lanny R<mailto:lanny.r at roadrunner.com>
To: Rockhounds at drizzle.com: A mailing list for rock and gem collectors<mailto:Rockhounds at drizzle.com:%20A%20mailing%20list%20for%20rock%20and%20gem%20collectors>
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Rockhounds] glacial erratics (was Stonehenge geology resolved)
I have a doubt about the "Big Rock," this Okotoks Erratic really being
one rock broken into two pieces. First, I don't recall ever seeing a
large rock that I was sure had obviously broken into two pieces where
it had settled in the middle so that the two pieces dipped inwards.
Secondly, I can't see any match in the layers between the two pieces.
That might be just a problem of how it is shown in the photograph, so
that one can't really see them all that well. Thirdly, the piece on
the right is more broken up and has a lot of rusty layers, very
unlike the left piece.
Any others care to express their opinion on this?
Regards,
Lanny
On Feb 2, 2009, at 8:48 AM, pmodreski at aol.com<mailto:pmodreski at aol.com> wrote:
> Neat website about that big rock, Kreigh!
>
>
> Some erratics are big. You might enjoy the size of the biggest one?
> ?
> http://culture.alberta.ca/museums/historicsiteslisting/okotokserratic/default.aspx<http://culture.alberta.ca/museums/historicsiteslisting/okotokserratic/default.aspx>?
> ?
> and the interesting legend of how it split in two.?
> ?
> Kreigh?
>
>
> And, alas, I'm afraid your post was a great disillusionment to me,
> because I couple of years ago I had visited, and was very impressed
> by, the Madison, Carroll County, New Hampshire, glacial erratic, a
> N.H. State "Wayside Monument" and locally known as "the largest
> known glacial erratic".? It is,
>
>
> "Madison Boulder is a huge granite rock measuring 83 feet (25 m) in
> length, 23 feet (7.0 m) in height above the ground, and 37 feet (11
> m) in width. It weighs upwards of 5,000 tons."
>
> Your Okotoks Erratic "Big Rock" in Alberta has?clearly got it all
> beat,
>
> "The Okotoks Erratic weighs 16,500 tons. It measures 9 metres high,
> 41 metres long and 18 metres wide."
>
> and?evidently holds the world record, as is stated in the very good
> Wikipedia article about glacial erratics,
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacial_erratic<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacial_erratic>
>
> Next time I'm in Alberta (never been there, actually), I've got to
> see it!
>
> Cheers, Pete
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Rockhounds at drizzle<mailto:Rockhounds at drizzle> Mailing List
> Subscription Services:
> http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/rockhounds<http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/rockhounds>
> List Home Page, with a link to the List Usage Policy:
> http://www.eclecticlapidary.com/Rockhounds/index.html<http://www.eclecticlapidary.com/Rockhounds/index.html>
--
_______________________________________________
Rockhounds at drizzle<mailto:Rockhounds at drizzle> Mailing List
Subscription Services:
http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/rockhounds<http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/rockhounds>
List Home Page, with a link to the List Usage Policy:
http://www.eclecticlapidary.com/Rockhounds/index.html<http://www.eclecticlapidary.com/Rockhounds/index.html>
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
More information about the Rockhounds
mailing list