[Rockhounds] Not your father's Mineral Collecting
DonH
donhalterman at q.com
Fri Apr 24 19:17:59 PDT 2009
Ted Kowalski wrote:
> I have some difficulty in the image this portrays. Not that I disagree that
> the flint was in the ballast, but I have some difficulty with the idea that
> ships regularly loaded flint as a toss away rock to adjust ballast.
Ted,
You make some good points and I'm sure others besides I are willing to
challenge long-held presumptions. However, all I can say is that a fair
amount of it has been collected... but then again, how many thousands of
tons would have been required as ballast? Certainly more than the
aggregate few tons I've seen for sale in rock shops.
As far as flints for flintlocks, one chunk of Dover flint goes a long
way, so there probably wouldn't have been a need for that much of it to
be imported, and in addition, I would imagine it would have been more
cost-effective to import finished flints rather than the native rock.
It would have also been more cost-effective to import sifted chalk
rather than mine run material that contained waste. And if it were
indeed waste, the thrifty and enterprising colonialists of the day would
certainly have found a use for the flint... as mentioned, Dover flint
(what some say is the only "true" flint, with anything being found in
America classified as "chert"), being superior in quality, was probably
a marketable commodity.
All we know for certain is that this Dover flint has appeared in two
states. There must be a bona fide historical record of this somewhere!
Thanks,
Don
More information about the Rockhounds
mailing list