[Rockhounds] Re: Subscript notations in e-mails

[Axel Emmermann]

> Hmm, more curious puzzlements... Axel, I was certainly glad 
> to read your reply comment to Bryan Kramer's post, because I 
> could not read his original post at all; 
> all that came 
> through for me was a big block of nonsense text, which began
> WW91IG1lYW4gdGhlIMOlIGFuZCDDhSB0aGUgdW1sYXV0IGlzIMO8IGFuZCDDpC

Hi Pete, sure I can read this... 
It goes like: double-U double-U ninety one I gee one L why double-U for
geedee....
I don't have a clue what it mean however (ROFLMAO. I'm like this all the
time. So, you gotta respect my wife for enduring this for 25 years plus
courtship and engagement.)

> and continued on for another several tens of lines... 
> interesting.  But now thanks to your responding to that, I 
> know what his message was supposed to say!  I wonder if many 
> other people received his message in the form I did.

I'll agree that we flemish people have an advantage over you since we speak
gibberish all the time (according to outlanders).

Cheers
Axel