[Rockhounds] NW Meteor hunters, forget it
Alan Goldstein
deepskyspy at insightbb.com
Thu Feb 21 17:43:45 PST 2008
I heard a meteor explode overhead in 1977. It sounded like a sonic boom at
almost exactly 3 PM. I went out to look for a fast moving jet. Naturally I
saw nothing, because the explosion occurred long before I went outside. It
certainly exploded a few miles overhead because the meteorites were
recovered over a pretty wide swath of town. The largest meteorite recovered
went through the roof of a house in west Louisville lodging in a rafter.
Smaller rocks punched a hole through a corrugated metal roof in a downtown
warehouse and went through a pane of glass in someone's sun room. No telling
how many were never found because they ended up in the street or in
someone's garden! I think they all ended up in the Smithsonian
Institution - including a specimen that was supposed to be returned to our
local museum, but those greedy SI meteorite folks reneged on their
agreement!
Your typical fireball meteor is caused by a pretty small piece of rock. Most
can't be tracked by FAA-type radar. That's actually a good thing or
migrating birds would wreak havoc in the spring and fall! I understand that
a large flock of sandhill cranes can be tracked, because together they can
be as large (or larger) as a 747 wingspan.
I have seen a bright green fireball go below the horizon. It looked like it
hit a few miles away, but as most already know, it probably vaporized in the
atmosphere hundreds of miles away and a dozen or more miles up in the
atmosphere.
Alan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lanny R" <lanny.r at roadrunner.com>
To: "Rockhounds at drizzle.com: A mailing list for rock and gem collectors"
<rockhounds at lists.drizzle.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Rockhounds] NW Meteor hunters, forget it
> Yes, with a lot of data, the impact point can be determined. But it can't
> be done just by knowing where a few cameras were pointed. To determine
> impact from the path, you need precise data including the location of the
> camera, the direction it was pointed, the focal length of the lens, the
> angle of the lens from horizontal and the precise time of each frame of
> the images. Most likely the meteor was a long way from the cameras, so
> any error in the measurements can make a big error in the results. With a
> bunch of these measurements from the track, one can create the track in
> 3-dimensions and determine the point of impact.
>
> As to the flash of the meteor seen over the Northwest two days ago,
> triangulating it will not give you the location of impact. These flashes
> that are often seen are not impact flashes, they are the meteor breaking
> up in the atmosphere. Triangulating on that will only give you the point
> over the ground where it exploded.
>
> Only really large meteors make a big fireball all the way to the ground
> followed by a big impact, and these we won't need any calculations to
> find. Small meteors are slowed so much by the denser, lower atmosphere
> that they cool and don't have a fiery trail to impact, and don't make a
> significant crater. Most likely, the meteor seen two days ago was not
> seen after the flash of it's explosion.
>
> The eye witness accounts of the "impacts" are typically completely wrong,
> especially in the dark. People misjudge their ability to determine the
> location of a flash in a dark sky, or even of a lighted moving object in
> the sky. They can't judge the size of an object or its distance from
> them. There is almost nothing for reference to make determinations in a
> dark sky (most people aren't very good at it in the light either).
> Consider this meteor, a report from AP news stated that a pilot for
> Northwest Airlines reported to see the flash of the impact of the meteor
> in southeastern Adams County in eastern Washington. Completely wrong.
>
> The news is finally out from scientists; the report from the University
> of Washington this morning, from data from a motion-wave detector is that
> the flash happened over La Grande, Oregon when the meteor broke up 19
> miles above the earth's surface. Now, break out all that surveillance
> camera data, make a lot of calculations to determine that trajectory
> before the flash and you will get the general area of where some small
> pieces might have impacted over a broad area on sagebrush (and snow)
> covered hills and/or forested snow covered mountains of Oregon, not
> Washington, unless of course the angle is low enough that they reached
> Idaho, or was the direction actually to Nevada?
>
> Regards,
>
> Lanny
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Kreigh Tomaszewski wrote:
>
>> If you have multiple pictures you could go the location each was taken
>> from and find the elevation and direction of the meteor in the sky.
>> Plotting them together should allow you to identify the track thru the
>> sky and come pretty close to the impact point.
>>
>> Kreigh
>>
>>
>>
>> Lanny R wrote:
>>>
>>> There is nothing to triangulate from. The security cameras show the
>>> usual flash of light or short term streak in the sky (all of them I
>>> saw on the local news looked like just about the same quality and same
>>> few seconds the news shows us time after time to report an exploding
>>> transformer, person illegally lighting a cigarette, a car crash or a
>>> robbery). There is a streak of light or a flash, then it's gone behind
>>> trees, hills or the building next door. There is no indication of the
>>> angle of decent. Thus one might be able to determine the heading, but
>>> how far did it go?
>>>
>>> The news reported the supposed witnessed impacts in Adams County, but
>>> also reported that the experts believed that if the meteor impacted,
>>> it was in the Pacific. After all, if it killed a jack rabbit in Adams
>>> County, how was it seen overhead in Washington?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Lanny
>>>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Rockhounds at drizzle Mailing List
> Subscription Services:
> http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/rockhounds
> List Home Page, with a link to the List Usage Policy:
> http://www.eclecticlapidary.com/Rockhounds/index.html
More information about the Rockhounds
mailing list