[Bulk] Re: [Rockhounds] Survival of the firmest - Scientists
say rocksevolve too
jabac
jabac at hal-pc.org
Mon Dec 1 17:59:25 PST 2008
Dora Smith wrote:
> Haven't we known for a long time that the hardest rocks resist
> erosion? Yup, they last the longest. This is why granite from the
> foundation of the Earth's crust can be found in the Adirondacks (New
> York). I had to consider that something less obvious could lie behind
> the subject heading, but thanks someone else for saying that it isn't
> new.
>
Harder rocks do "last longer" as you say, but consider that the
mountains of Eastern North America are much older than those of the
West, and a whole lot more material had to be removed from them to
expose what we now see. A great deal of the center of the country to
the depth of many miles is now covered with the remains of that erosion.
So maybe hard rocks resist erosion, but it took a long, long time to
expose what is now visible. The Appalachians and Laurentians are showing
us their remaining roots, not the proud crests they once were. They are
incidentally not from the foundation of the Earth's crust, but were the
result of the collision of two plates some time in the past. If there
are any "ur-rocks" around the East coast of North America, they are
buried many miles below the present surface.
Consider also that mountain ranges do not just arise and say "Well, here
we are..." They may be thrust up continuously over millions of years,
and simultaneously worn down so that the average elevation only
suggests the amount of material involved. Those hard rocks are eroding
fast enough to not rise out of sight. Similar to the deposits in the
East, the Great Plains in the West all the way to the Mississippi and
the Gulf Coast are covered with the remains of the hard rock eroded from
the Rocky Mountain Uplift.
Again, consider granite, the very metaphor of "hard rock"; it clearly
and quickly shows itself being eroded in its rounding and discoloration
of the first few inched of exposed surface. Were it not for that, the
whole character of the West and the Western Movie would be different, a
lot more jagged and rugged, maybe more "primitive"...(? )
Even the Himalayas, which are the result of a huge upthrust from the
Indian plate against Asia in a relatively short geological time, have
not risen out of sight, so to speak. And the higher they go, the more
wind and water ice, the most effective agents of erosion work on them.
(All because water happens to have more volume as a solid than as a
liquid. Curious, no?)
Maybe the point is that sooner or later, almost all the rock that is
created and exposed is eroded out of existence. I should think that the
Canadian Shield is one of if not the last remaining exposed "original"
pieces of rock on the planet(except for odd pieces here and there); the
rest have long since been transformed into newer things or had their
core buried under the results of ages and eras of uplift and erosion. We
have to appreciate something that is very hard to comprehend, and that
is how vast and staggering is the span of geological time. If we were to
have a life span of several million years, things would seem to change
much more quickly than they do, and even then geological time would seem
incredibly long. How fast is fast? It depends on the unit of measure, I
guess.
> Biologically produced rock isn't an example of survival of the firmest
> - LOL, not hardly. Usually it's just newest and closest to the surface.
> Is the point an ecological idea that the geological character of the
> planet has evolved over time? Problem there is it isn't a
> geological principle. And no new facts, just a new way of looking at
> what was already known.
>
Mineralogically speaking, who knows? There is no question that the whole
character of the planet would be entirely different without the long
term presence of 20 to 25% of free oxygen in the atmosphere. On the
other hand, if it were not so, it's not likely that we would be here to
speculate on the finer points of any question. Life is interactive with
its environment. So be it.
> Yours,
> Dora Smith
> Austin, TX
> tiggernut24 at yahoo.com
>
> --
john
More information about the Rockhounds
mailing list