[Rockhounds] lead-bearing Broken Hill orthoclase
DonH
donhalterman at verizon.net
Tue Oct 23 17:48:26 PDT 2007
J Bryan Kramer wrote:
> Geez why don't they just do what chemists do, call it lead (II) orthoclase.
> Perfectly transparent and obvious.
I agree, though the nomenclature for minerals has been set up to
distinguish between whether it is a species where lead is a primary
cation, or whether it is simply a lead-rich variety of an existing
species that doesn't warrant its own unique name, etc. I think we're
stuck with those conventions for a while unless the mineral community
agrees to a wholesale revision of the nomenclature, which would no doubt
be accompanied by years of fretting, debate, fussing, and pontification,
after which a number of people would deplore the final decision anyway.
best,
Don
More information about the Rockhounds
mailing list