[Rockhounds] The Vaux collection at the Academy of Science in
Phily
DonH
donhalterman at verizon.net
Tue Jul 3 08:18:12 PDT 2007
Jim Daly wrote:
> There's the crux of the matter. The Academy should never have accepted a bequest with such a restrictive stipulation.
Such things were common in older days, when museums were building their
holdings and also when they considered themselves repositories of
knowledge rather than centers of entertainment and make-believe Jurassic
park dinosaurs. The idea of something being "in perpetuity," of being
enduring for generations, was a noble one. In response to what Tim J.
said as well, it is the museum's job to use their trust fund to fulfill
their obligations. The geology collection was a centerpiece of their
collection, something seen by thousands of school children every year on
class trips and by thousands of walk-in visitors. Along the way someone
lost sight of the purpose and value of that collection. Yet they still
have hall upon hall of stuffed animals in dioramas--in my view, could
anything be more outdated and space-consuming?
As I wrote to someone off-list, minerals and geology will become very
important in the next few decades as emerging economies compete for
scarce resources and mining in the U.S. becomes cool again. If Sierra
Club members want to continue driving their SUVs and once people realize
that producing ethanol consumes more fossil fuel than it saves, we need
to explore for resources right here. That goes for metals as well as
oil. Nowadays, most kids get their knowledge of geology from the
Discovery Channel--we call them the "Discovery Channel generation"--and
the bulk of them want to be seismologists or volcanologists when they
start. When I talk about mining and minerals, they look at me like I'm
from another planet and wonder what that has to do with geology! Maybe
if they had access to a museum with well-planned displays they would
understand.
Don
More information about the Rockhounds
mailing list